Back to plugin directory
#211 rankedTier S

Web Accessibility (formally known as Ally) – WCAG Scanning, Guided Fixes, Usability Widget

By Elementor

View on WordPress.org
Active installs500K+
WP Rank score77.1
Rating2.9 / 5
Reviews163
Version4.1.4
Last updatedAug 24, 2026

Overview

This WordPress plugin combines URL-by-URL accessibility scans with guided remediation, a visitor-facing usability widget, and an accessibility statement generator. It can help site owners identify common issues, but it does not replace human testing or professional review.

Web Accessibility (formally known as Ally) – WCAG Scanning, Guided Fixes, Usability Widget is ranked #211 among WordPress.org plugins by WP Rank with a score of 77.1. It has 500,000+ active installs and 6,255,369 total downloads. Users rate it 2.9 out of 5 across 163 reviews. It was downloaded 43,206 times in the last 15 days. The latest release (4.1.4) was published on Aug 24, 2026. It is tested up to WordPress 7.0.8 and requires PHP 7.4. 0% of its 3 support threads are resolved.

Install Trend

Based on the last 15 days of WordPress.org download stats.

43,206 downloads (15d)
10-2310-2410-2510-2610-2710-2810-2910-3010-3111-0111-0211-0311-0411-05
Web Accessibility (formally known as Ally) – WCAG Scanning, Guided Fixes, Usability Widget

Compatibility

Requires WordPress6.7
Tested up to7.0.8
Requires PHP7.4
AddedOct 29, 2015

Description

On-demand scans and guided accessibility fixes

The Assistant scans individual URLs and organizes accessibility issues by type and severity, with guidance for addressing them. It covers more than 180 common violations based on WCAG 2.1 AA, including missing image descriptions, form errors, incorrect page structure, and keyboard-access problems.

You can make manual changes or use AI-generated suggestions, then track progress in a visual dashboard. This approach suits site owners who want to work through issues page by page; color contrast and visual-style checks are described as forthcoming rather than current capabilities.

Visitor controls and widget customization

The widget gives visitors ways to adjust how they experience a site, while creators can tailor its appearance and behavior.

  • Display controls: Offer contrast modes, font resizing, readable fonts, text spacing and alignment, image hiding, and animation pausing.
  • Navigation aids: Provide keyboard enhancements, underlined links, a reading guide, skip-to-content access, and a sitemap viewer.
  • Language options: The widget follows the site’s language settings; a language selector directly in the widget is a premium feature.
  • Appearance and placement: Choose the icon type, size, colors, and corner position, and set whether it appears on mobile or desktop.
  • Visibility rules: Enable or disable features by device or user role, and add or edit the sitemap URL.
  • Premium capabilities: Paid plans add screen reader compatibility improvements, removal of Elementor branding, and usage analytics. Check plan details if these options are essential to your setup.

Accessibility statements, account connection and compliance limits

The plugin can generate a customizable accessibility statement and publish it as a dedicated page, which can also be linked through the widget. Using the plugin requires an active Elementor account, with the connection initiated manually in the plugin settings; its service is operated by Elementor as a third party.

For GDPR obligations, site owners must list Elementor as a sub-processor in their privacy notice. The plugin explicitly warns that it cannot guarantee full compliance: automated fixes do not replace human testing, judgment, or review by qualified accessibility professionals.

A useful starting point, not a substitute for accessibility expertise

Web Accessibility brings scanning, visitor controls, and statement generation together, making it a practical starting point for freelancers, agencies, and site owners seeking to improve accessibility.

  • Best fit: Teams that want guided checks and visitor-facing options as part of a broader accessibility process.
  • Trade-off: Treat scan results and AI suggestions as assistance, not proof of compliance; full review requires human testing and qualified expertise.
  • Public signals: Adoption is widespread, but user ratings are poor. All three listed support threads are unresolved, and the plugin was updated about ten weeks ago. Consider whether that support record meets your needs before relying on it for an ongoing accessibility program.